Publish curated ITWorx-ModelForge source from 990401737f96c8d46a9f7b0d84994516cadcb6a0

This commit is contained in:
Public Source Publisher committed 2026-09-30 09:23:17 +00:00
1 parent 7082ab955a
commit 848f0d8f8a
434 files changed
+67298 -4315

No files matched your search

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
# ADR-0051: Manual canary observations are rehearsal-only
Status: accepted for P00 containment, 2026-09-08.
The operational Console previously offered fixed successful and failed canary observations.
The lifecycle service accepted those counters and health fields as canary results. Reaching the
target count could satisfy the canary review gate without a measured request. Other promotion
and approval checks remained; this finding does not imply unrestricted production promotion.
Remove both synthetic controls from the Console. Keep manual observation compatibility only for
an explicitly persisted LAB rehearsal: a LAB_REHEARSAL subject in LAB, a consistent LAB approval
with LAB_PROMOTION policy, and a plan targeting LAB_STABLE. Client labels and observation fields
cannot grant that scope. Refuse other manual observations before changing counters, status or
audit state. Attribute accepted manual observations to the authenticated operator and request
correlation, and label their result as manual rehearsal evidence.
Also refuse non-rehearsal canary commits, including existing READY records with no authoritative
evidence. Do not invent a trusted source flag that a client can submit to bypass the restriction.
This deliberately leaves real canary qualification unavailable until P05 adds an authoritative
evidence ingestion contract. Existing non-canary transitions retain their independent checks.
P05 must consume deduplicated real gateway requests for the exact candidate/deployment and time
window, combine observed runtime/scheduler health without converting unknown to healthy, and use
transactional concurrency control. Production qualification requires that follow-on implementation
and isolated real-workload evidence. Manual LAB rehearsal proves only the lifecycle mechanics.
No schema change is needed for containment; existing result metadata can label the evidence.
Rollback to the old implementation would restore the unverified-observation path and is not a
safe remedy for blocked production canaries. Existing explicit abort/rollback operations remain
available for reconciliation.